math: be better than science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
, elementary school
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, core
Weight: 0.59
Siblings calculus
Weight: 0.61
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.34
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.34
, science
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than science 1.00
be in science 0.89
be important in science 0.89
be important to science 0.88
is science 0.88
be used in science 0.87
be useful in science 0.86
be related to science 0.85
be needed for computer science 0.85
be involved in science 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(calculus, be needed for computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculus, be needed for computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(math, be better than science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be in science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(math, be used in science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be involved in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be involved in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, be related to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(math, be in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(math, be in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(math, is science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(math, be used in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(math, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(math, be useful in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(math, be important in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(math, be involved in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(math, be related to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(math, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(math, be involved in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(math, be related to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(math, be important in science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(math, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(math, be better than science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, be better than science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculus, be needed for computer science)