mcdonald: has fries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has fries 1.00
is fries 0.99
give fries 0.96
has french fries 0.93
give away fries 0.93
give free fries 0.93
is french fries 0.92
give away free fries 0.89
has burgers 0.87
has put pickles on burgers 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has fries)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give free fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)