mcdonald: has put pickles on burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has put pickles on burgers 1.00
has put onions on burgers 0.93
has burgers 0.92
has hamburgers 0.86
has fries 0.86
is fries 0.85
give fries 0.84
has cheeseburgers 0.82
give away fries 0.82
give free fries 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give free fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)