mcdonald: has hamburgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has hamburgers 1.00
has burgers 0.91
has put pickles on burgers 0.86
has cheeseburgers 0.85
has fries 0.85
has put onions on burgers 0.84
is fries 0.83
has double cheeseburgers 0.82
give fries 0.81
give free fries 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give free fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)