mcdonald: has burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has burgers 1.00
has put pickles on burgers 0.92
has hamburgers 0.91
has put onions on burgers 0.90
has fries 0.87
is fries 0.86
has cheeseburgers 0.85
give fries 0.83
give free fries 0.81
has double cheeseburgers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give free fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)