mcdonald: is fries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fries 1.00
has fries 0.99
give fries 0.97
give away fries 0.93
is french fries 0.93
give free fries 0.93
has french fries 0.93
give away free fries 0.89
has burgers 0.86
has put pickles on burgers 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has french fries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give away fries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is french fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give away free fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give free fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)