mcdonald: has milkshakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has milkshakes 1.00
has sodas 0.79
spit in burgers 0.79
is milkshake machine 0.79
is milkshake machine broken 0.78
serve burgers rare 0.75
is burger 0.75
is fries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has milkshakes)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has sodas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has sodas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has sodas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has sodas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has milkshakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has milkshakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)