mcdonalds: is burger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is burger 1.00
be better than burger king 0.91
be healthier than burger king 0.89
put pickles on burgers 0.86
spit in burgers 0.86
is fries 0.85
put gherkins in burgers 0.84
be fries 0.84
be fries made 0.82
be fries really made 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)