mcdonalds: be expensive in canada

Related concepts

Parents	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.73 , fast food chain Weight: 0.68 , food chain Weight: 0.66 , chain Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mcdonald Weight: 0.37 , starbucks Weight: 0.36 , taco bell Weight: 0.35 , fast food Weight: 0.35 , hey Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in canada	1.00
be more expensive in canada	0.98
be expensive in france	0.83
be green in europe	0.76
is expensive	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(starbucks, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(starbucks, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)