mcdonalds: be expensive in france

Related concepts

Parents	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.73 , fast food chain Weight: 0.68 , food chain Weight: 0.66 , chain Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mcdonald Weight: 0.37 , starbucks Weight: 0.36 , taco bell Weight: 0.35 , fast food Weight: 0.35 , hey Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in france	1.00
be green in france	0.90
be expensive in canada	0.83
be more expensive in canada	0.83
be green in europe	0.78
is expensive	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(starbucks, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be green in france)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be green in france)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be green in france)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be green in france)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be green in europe)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(starbucks, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)