metal: be hard and shiny

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard and shiny 1.00
be hard 0.82
be plastic as hard be to soft 0.80
be hard than plastic 0.79
be hard than paper 0.76
be strong and hard 0.76
be hard than rubber 0.76
be hard than wood 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, be hard)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong and hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than paper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than paper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wood)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than paper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(metal, be hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steel, be strong and hard)