metal: be plastic as hard be to soft

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be plastic as hard be to soft 1.00
be hard than plastic 0.91
be hard than rubber 0.82
be hard and shiny 0.80
be hard 0.80
be hard than paper 0.80
be hard than wood 0.79
be strong and hard 0.78
be hard than wool 0.76
be hard than iron 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, be hard)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong and hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wool)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than paper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than paper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wool)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(metal, be hard and shiny)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard and shiny)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard and shiny)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(metal, be hard and shiny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wool)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than paper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(metal, be hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than iron)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steel, be strong and hard)