metal: be hard than paper

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard than paper 1.00
be hard than plastic 0.88
be hard than wood 0.86
be hard 0.84
be hard than air 0.84
be hard than rubber 0.83
be hard than lead 0.81
be hard than wool 0.80
be plastic as hard be to soft 0.80
be hard than iron 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than lead)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be hard than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than lead)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than paper)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than air)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wood)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wool)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(metal, be hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wood)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than air)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than air)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than air)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than iron)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than lead)