metal: be hard than wood

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard than wood 1.00
be hard than iron 0.86
be hard than paper 0.86
be hard than plastic 0.86
be hard than rubber 0.85
be hard than air 0.82
be hard than wool 0.82
be hard 0.81
be hard than lead 0.80
be plastic as hard be to soft 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than lead)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be hard than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than lead)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than iron)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wood)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than air)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than paper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wool)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wool)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than paper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than paper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than air)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(metal, be hard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than air)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than lead)