metal: be hard than wool

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard than wool 1.00
be hard than wood 0.82
be hard than paper 0.80
be hard than rubber 0.80
be hard than plastic 0.79
be hard than air 0.77
be hard than iron 0.76
be plastic as hard be to soft 0.76
be hard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, be hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than iron)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wool)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than wood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than paper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(metal, be hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than wood)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than paper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than paper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than paper)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(metal, be plastic as hard be to soft)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(metal, be hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than rubber)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(metal, be hard than air)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than air)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(metal, be hard than air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be hard than wool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than iron)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(metal, be hard than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be hard)