mining: be for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for environment 1.00
be good for environment 0.95
be bad for environment 0.93
help environment 0.92
affect environment 0.89
hurt environment 0.84
effect environment 0.84
harm environment 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mining, be for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mining, help environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mining, effect environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mining, help environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mining, help environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mining, harm environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mining, help environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mining, effect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mining, effect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(mining, harm environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mining, hurt environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mining, hurt environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mining, harm environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, effect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mining, hurt environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mining, hurt environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mining, be for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)