mining: effect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
effect environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be for environment 0.84
harm environment 0.81
be bad for environment 0.81
help environment 0.81
be good for environment 0.80
have impact 0.80
hurt environment 0.80
have impact on resources 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mining, effect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mining, be for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mining, harm environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mining, help environment)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, effect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mining, effect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mining, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)