mining: hurt environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt environment 1.00
affect environment 0.89
harm environment 0.86
be bad for environment 0.86
help environment 0.84
be for environment 0.84
be good for environment 0.84
effect environment 0.80
affect economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mining, hurt environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mining, harm environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mining, hurt environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mining, hurt environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mining, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)