mobile phone: is computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is computer 1.00
be better than laptops 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(smartphone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is computer)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(smartphone, is computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)