monopoly: be good for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for economy 1.00
be bad for economy 0.98
affect economy 0.90
be undesirable for economy 0.84
be dangerous in capitalist economy 0.82
affect market economies 0.81
be good 0.80
is bad for 0.77
be important to business 0.76
be bad for capitalism 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, affect economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be good for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(capitalism, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(capitalism, affect economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be bad for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(monopoly, affect economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(monopoly, affect market economies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, affect market economies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(monopoly, affect economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(monopoly, affect market economies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monopoly, be undesirable for economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, affect market economies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(monopoly, affect economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monopoly, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be important to business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be undesirable for economy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be important to business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(monopoly, be important to business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, affect economy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(monopoly, be undesirable for economy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be undesirable for economy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(capitalism, affect economy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for economy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capitalism, be bad for economy)