monotreme: have classed as placentals

Related concepts

Parents	mammal Weight: 0.68 , thing Weight: 0.51 , marsupial Weight: 0.48 , animal Weight: 0.39 , bird Weight: 0.26
Siblings	platypus Weight: 0.60 , echidna Weight: 0.51 , humpback whale Weight: 0.36 , blue whale Weight: 0.35 , whale Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have classed as placentals	1.00
have classed as mammals marsupials	0.86
be regarded as mammals	0.83
be different from placentals	0.82
be regarded as primitive mammals	0.81
be classified as mammals	0.80
be regarded very primitive	0.78
be considered mammals	0.77
be called monotremes	0.77
be regarded primitive	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be considered mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.18

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(blue whale, be considered mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from placentals)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from placentals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be called monotremes)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be classified as mammals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from placentals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from placentals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(monotreme, be called monotremes)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(monotreme, be classified as mammals)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded primitive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded primitive)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(monotreme, be called monotremes)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(monotreme, be classified as mammals)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be called monotremes)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded primitive)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be classified as mammals)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded primitive)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(blue whale, be considered mammals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(monotreme, have classed as placentals) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)