mute: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents button
Weight: 0.55
, function
Weight: 0.52
, control
Weight: 0.46
, feature
Weight: 0.44
, term
Weight: 0.43
Siblings push button
Weight: 0.32
, joystick
Weight: 0.31
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.30
, remote control
Weight: 0.30
, simple function
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality system 0.82
has quality difference 0.77
is terrible 0.77
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(button, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(control, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(button, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(control, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(button, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(control, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(button, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(button, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(button, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(control, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mute, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(button, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mute, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(button, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mute, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mute, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mute, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mute, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(remote control, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(remote control, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mute, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mute, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(button, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(button, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(control, has quality system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(remote control, is terrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(control, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(term, has quality system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(button, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(button, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mute, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)