national parks: be important to environment

Related concepts

Parents	park Weight: 0.70 , campground Weight: 0.64 , wilderness Weight: 0.64 , united states Weight: 0.63
Siblings	yellowstone national park Weight: 0.83 , lake powell Weight: 0.70 , yellowstone Weight: 0.57 , national park Weight: 0.40 , central park Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to environment	1.00
help environment	0.90
protect environment	0.85
be important to community	0.78
be important to us	0.77
be important to people	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(park, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(park, be important to community) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(park, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(park, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(park, be important to environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(park, be important to us)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(park, be important to community)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(park, be important to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(park, be important to environment)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(park, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(park, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(national parks, be important to environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(park, be important to community) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(national parks, be important to environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(park, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(national parks, be important to environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(park, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(national parks, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(central park, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(national parks, be important to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(national parks, help environment)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(national parks, protect environment)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(national parks, protect environment)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(national parks, help environment)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(national parks, help environment)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(national parks, protect environment)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(national parks, help environment)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(national parks, protect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(national parks, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(park, be important to us)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(park, be important to people)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(park, be important to community)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(central park, be important to people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(park, be important to environment)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(park, be important to us)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(park, be important to community)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(national parks, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(park, be important to people)