nitrate: be in lunch meat bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical compound
Weight: 0.59
, mineral
Weight: 0.56
, chemical
Weight: 0.55
, compound
Weight: 0.55
Siblings ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.80
, potassium nitrate
Weight: 0.77
, nitroglycerin
Weight: 0.64
, sodium nitrate
Weight: 0.37
, silver nitrate
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in lunch meat bad 1.00
be in meat 0.87
be added to meat 0.84
be bad in bacon 0.79
be added to processed meat 0.78
be bad for fish 0.77
be used in cured meats 0.76
be in bacon 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sodium nitrate, be added to meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(sodium nitrate, be added to meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(sodium nitrate, be added to meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nitrate, be in meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nitrate, be in meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nitrate, be in meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(nitrate, be added to meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(nitrate, be added to meat)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nitrate, be in lunch meat bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sodium nitrate, be added to meat)