normalization: be important for relational databases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.58
, transformation
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cooperation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, recovery
Weight: 0.31
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, democracy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for relational databases 1.00
be important for databases 0.91
be important in database 0.86
be required in database 0.83
be important in database design 0.82
be needed in design of database 0.80
be required in database design 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for databases)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be important for databases)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for databases)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for databases)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases)