normalization: be important in database design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.58
, transformation
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cooperation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, recovery
Weight: 0.31
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, democracy
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in database design 1.00
be needed in design of database 0.97
be required in database design 0.96
be important in database 0.93
be required in database 0.89
be important for databases 0.88
be important for relational databases 0.82
be needed in design 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database design)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database design)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(normalization, be required in database design)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for databases)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(normalization, be required in database design)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(normalization, be needed in design)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database design)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for databases)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(normalization, be needed in design)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be needed in design)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important in database)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for databases)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(normalization, be required in database)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be needed in design of database)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be required in database)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(normalization, be important for databases)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(normalization, be important for relational databases)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(normalization, be important in database)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(normalization, be important for relational databases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(normalization, be important in database design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(normalization, be important in database design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(normalization, be important in database design)