nuclear weapon: be more hazardous than conventional weapons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more hazardous than conventional weapons 1.00
be more hazardous than weapons 0.94
be much more destructive than traditional explosives 0.87
be worse than conventional 0.85
be worse than other weapons 0.85
be worse than weapons 0.85
be much more destructive than explosives 0.84
be worse than conventional attacks 0.83
differ from chemical weapons 0.82
differ from other weapons 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(weapon, differ from other weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(weapon, differ from other weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(weapon, differ from other weapons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(weapon, differ from other weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, differ from other weapons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(weapon, differ from other weapons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than weapons)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than conventional attacks)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than other weapons)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)