nuclear weapon: be much more destructive than traditional explosives

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.80
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.75
, weapon
Weight: 0.73
, missile
Weight: 0.73
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.67
Siblings atomic bomb
Weight: 0.79
, neutron bomb
Weight: 0.72
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.72
, cruise missile
Weight: 0.71
, trident
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much more destructive than traditional explosives 1.00
be much more destructive than explosives 0.98
be more hazardous than conventional weapons 0.87
be more destructive than atom bomb 0.85
be more hazardous than weapons 0.83
be worse than bombs 0.82
be different from bombs used 0.81
be more powerful than atom bomb 0.81
be different from bombs 0.81
be different to bombs 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be different to bombs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be different from bombs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be different from bombs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, be different from bombs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be different to bombs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, be different to bombs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, be different from bombs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, be different to bombs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(nuclear weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, be worse than bombs)