ohio: has state election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state election 1.00
have election 0.97
be important in election 0.94
need election 0.94
have special election 0.92
is special election 0.92
be important state during elections 0.92
hold election 0.91
be important state during national elections 0.90
be important in presidential elections 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ohio, has state election)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ohio, have election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ohio, have election)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important in election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ohio, is special election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, have special election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, have election)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ohio, is special election)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ohio, have special election)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ohio, is special election)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ohio, have special election)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is special election)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special election)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have election)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important state during national elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, has state election)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)