ohio: be important in election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in election 1.00
have election 0.97
need election 0.96
be important in elections 0.95
has state election 0.94
is special election 0.93
have special election 0.93
be important state during elections 0.93
need special election 0.92
be important in presidential elections 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important in election)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ohio, have election)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ohio, have election)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important in elections)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ohio, has state election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, has state election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ohio, is special election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, have election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ohio, have special election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ohio, is special election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, have special election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ohio, need special election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, need special election)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ohio, has state election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ohio, is special election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ohio, have special election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, need special election)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is special election)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ohio, need special election)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special election)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)