ohio: be important in elections

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in elections 1.00
be important state during elections 0.97
be important in presidential elections 0.95
be important in election 0.95
be central to elections 0.94
be important state during national elections 0.93
have election 0.92
be central to presidential elections 0.92
need election 0.91
has state election 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential elections)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important in elections)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important in election)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ohio, have election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ohio, have election)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ohio, has state election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, has state election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, have election)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ohio, has state election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important state during national elections)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have election)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential elections)