iowa: be important in election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in election 1.00
be important to election 1.00
is important election state 0.98
is election state 0.95
be important in general election 0.95
be important in election process 0.95
be important in presidential election 0.95
be important in elections 0.95
be important to presidential election 0.94
be important to elections 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in election)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, is important election state)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, is important election state)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in general election)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in general election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to elections)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to elections)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iowa, is important election state)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in general election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to elections)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is important election state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in general election)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to presidential election)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(iowa, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)