iowa: be important in election process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in election process 1.00
be crucial in election process 0.96
be important in election 0.95
be important to election 0.94
is important election state 0.93
be important in elections 0.91
be important to elections 0.91
is election state 0.90
be important in presidential election 0.90
be important in general election 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in elections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(ohio, be important in elections)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in election process)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(iowa, be crucial in election process)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, is important election state)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in elections)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important to elections)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in general election)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(iowa, be crucial in election process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(iowa, be crucial in election process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be crucial in election process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iowa, is important election state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important to elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in general election)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in election)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, is important election state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important to elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, be important in general election)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is important election state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in presidential election)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in general election)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in elections)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important to elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(iowa, be important in election process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in elections)