ohio: have special election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have special election 1.00
is special election 0.99
need special election 0.98
hold special election 0.96
have election 0.94
be important in election 0.93
need election 0.93
has state election 0.92
hold election 0.91
have special congressional election 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be important in election)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, be important in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, be important in election)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ohio, have special election)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ohio, is special election)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, need special election)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ohio, is special election)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ohio, need special election)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ohio, hold special election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ohio, is special election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(ohio, hold special election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ohio, have election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, need special election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, be important in election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ohio, has state election)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ohio, have election)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ohio, hold special election)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ohio, be important in election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ohio, has state election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ohio, have special congressional election)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ohio, have special congressional election)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ohio, have election)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important in election)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ohio, has state election)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ohio, have special congressional election)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special congressional election)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is special election)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ohio, hold special election)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ohio, need special election)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has state election)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have election)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important in election)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ohio, have special election)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iowa, be important in election)