overpopulation: be in china problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in china 1.00
be in china problem 1.00
be in china 0.90
is problem brainly 0.81
be problem for india 0.80
be problem in india 0.80
be in india problem 0.80
be problem to world 0.80
be problem in america 0.79
be such problem in america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in china)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in china)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)