overpopulation: be problem in china

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.66 , crisis Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.65 , topic Weight: 0.65 , factor Weight: 0.62
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.35 , inequality Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in china	1.00
be in china problem	1.00
be in china	0.90
is problem brainly	0.81
be problem for india	0.80
be problem in india	0.80
be in india problem	0.80
be problem to world	0.80
be problem in america	0.79
be such problem in america	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in china problem)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in china problem)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china problem)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in china)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in china)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in china)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in china)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in china problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in china) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)