overpopulation: be problem in philippines

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.66 , crisis Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.65 , topic Weight: 0.65 , factor Weight: 0.62
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.35 , inequality Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in philippines	1.00
be problem in india	0.84
be in india problem	0.84
be problem for india	0.84
be problem in america	0.81
be such problem in america	0.79
be problem in africa	0.79
be problem in jamaica	0.77
is problem brainly	0.76
be bad for australia	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in jamaica)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in india)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in jamaica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in jamaica)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in india)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in jamaica)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)