painting: be romantic style

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
Siblings oil painting
Weight: 0.72
, photograph
Weight: 0.64
, sketch
Weight: 0.64
, canvas
Weight: 0.62
, last supper
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be romantic style 1.00
be romantic styles 0.93
done in style of renaissance naturalism 0.80
done in style 0.79
has physical part style 0.78
fit style 0.78
fit neoclassical style 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(painting, be romantic style)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(painting, has physical part style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic styles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(painting, be romantic styles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(painting, has physical part style)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(painting, has physical part style)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(painting, has physical part style)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(painting, be romantic styles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(painting, fit style)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, done in style)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(painting, be romantic styles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit style)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(painting, fit style)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(painting, fit style)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(painting, done in style)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(painting, be romantic style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(painting, be romantic style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic style)