painting: fit neoclassical style

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
Siblings oil painting
Weight: 0.72
, photograph
Weight: 0.64
, sketch
Weight: 0.64
, canvas
Weight: 0.62
, last supper
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
fit neoclassical style 1.00
fit style 0.85
has physical part style 0.79
done in style of renaissance naturalism 0.78
be romantic style 0.77
done in style 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(painting, fit style)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(painting, fit style)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(painting, fit style)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(painting, has physical part style)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(painting, has physical part style)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(painting, has physical part style)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(painting, be romantic style)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, done in style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(painting, has physical part style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(painting, be romantic style)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(painting, done in style)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(painting, be romantic style)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style)