panda: be called red panda

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wild animal
Weight: 0.59
, bear
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.41
, giant panda
Weight: 0.40
, red panda
Weight: 0.40
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called red panda 1.00
be called panda 0.98
is panda 0.97
be called red pandas 0.92
be called pandas 0.88
be called giant pandas 0.87
be named pandas 0.86
play with pandas 0.85
be related to pandas 0.85
be related to giant pandas 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called red panda)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called panda)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is panda)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called pandas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(red panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called red panda)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red panda, be called panda)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called panda)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red panda, is panda)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red panda, is panda)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red panda, be called red pandas)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red panda, be called pandas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called pandas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(giant panda, be called pandas)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to giant pandas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(panda, be called red panda)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(panda, be called panda)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(panda, be called panda)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(panda, be called panda)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(panda, be called pandas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(panda, be called pandas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(panda, be called pandas)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(panda, be named pandas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(panda, be named pandas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(panda, be named pandas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called panda)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called giant pandas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called pandas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(panda, be named pandas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(panda, be called red panda)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, be called red panda)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, is panda)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(red panda, be called panda)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red panda, be called pandas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called giant pandas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(panda, be called red panda)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas)