partnership: work in team

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, relationship
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, commitment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.33
, merger
Weight: 0.33
, acquisition
Weight: 0.33
, pact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in team 1.00
be important in team 0.92
work in game 0.85
work 0.80
work in multidisciplinary team 0.79
be important at work 0.78
work at all 0.78
is hard work 0.77
be with game 0.76
be in game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(commitment, be important in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(commitment, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(relationship, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(commitment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(strategy, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(issue, be with game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(strategy, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(commitment, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(relationship, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important in team)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(issue, be with game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important at work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(relationship, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important at work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(issue, be with game)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important in team)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(commitment, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be important at work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pact, work in game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contract, work at all)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(contract, be in game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(merger, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contract, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(commitment, be important in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in team)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(commitment, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in team)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(relationship, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in team)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(commitment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in team)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(strategy, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in team)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(issue, be with game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in team)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(acquisition, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(acquisition, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(contract, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(contract, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(merger, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(merger, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(pact, work in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pact, work in game)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(friendship, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(friendship, be important at work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(contract, work at all) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contract, work at all)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contract, be in game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(partnership, work in team)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(partnership, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(partnership, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(partnership, work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in multidisciplinary team)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(partnership, work in multidisciplinary team)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partnership, work in multidisciplinary team)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(partnership, work in multidisciplinary team)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(partnership, work in team)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(commitment, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in team)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(issue, be with game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(relationship, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commitment, be important at work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(acquisition, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(contract, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(merger, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(friendship, be important at work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pact, work in game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(contract, be in game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contract, work at all)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(commitment, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in team)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(issue, be with game)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(relationship, work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(partnership, work in team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commitment, be important at work)