:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pet, is cats)
Similarity expansion
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet, be called pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pet, is dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pet, be than cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pet, be than cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pet, is dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pet, be than cats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pet, be than cats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pet, be called pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet, is dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pet, is dog)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pet, be called pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pet, is dog)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pet, is dogs)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dogs)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, be called pets)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pet, is dog)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
Typical implies Plausible
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pet, is cats)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pet, is cats)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)