petrol: be more convenient fuel than coal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fuel
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.55
, commodity
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
, liquid
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.40
, gasoline
Weight: 0.39
, diesel
Weight: 0.38
, gas
Weight: 0.37
, motor oil
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more convenient fuel than coal 1.00
be more convenient fuel for cars 0.92
be better than coal 0.89
be better than coal for cars 0.88
is efficient fuel 0.86
be less efficient than diesel 0.86
is better fuel 0.85
be more expensive than diesel 0.84
be more efficient than ethanol 0.84
be cheaper than diesel 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fuel oil, be better than coal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fuel oil, be better than coal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fuel oil, be better than coal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel for cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel for cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel for cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be better than coal for cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(petrol, be better than coal for cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(petrol, be better than coal for cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel for cars)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(petrol, be better than coal for cars)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(petrol, be more efficient than ethanol)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(petrol, is better fuel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(petrol, is better fuel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petrol, is better fuel)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(petrol, is better fuel)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(petrol, be less efficient than diesel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(petrol, be more expensive than diesel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(petrol, is efficient fuel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(petrol, be cheaper than diesel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fuel oil, be better than coal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gasoline, be more expensive than diesel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(petrol, be more convenient fuel than coal)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gasoline, be cheaper than diesel)