picnic: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gathering
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.59
, picnic table
Weight: 0.58
, meal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings barbecue
Weight: 0.36
, brunch
Weight: 0.35
, carnival
Weight: 0.35
, dinner
Weight: 0.35
, parade
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is good for 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
CAN good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(dinner, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(picnic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(picnic, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(picnic, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(picnic, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(picnic, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dinner, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dinner, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(barbecue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(barbecue, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(dinner, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dinner, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(barbecue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbecue, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(picnic, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(picnic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinner, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(barbecue, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dinner, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(barbecue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(picnic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
...