planning: be as function

Property	Similarity
be as function	1.00
has quality function	0.91
be as function of management	0.90
be as primary function	0.90
is management function	0.86
be as primary function of management	0.85
be important function in endeavor	0.84
be as function of managers	0.83
is primary management function	0.83
be as pervasive function	0.83

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of management)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(planning, is management function)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(planning, be important function in endeavor)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as function of managers)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(planning, is primary management function)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(planning, be as pervasive function)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(planning, be as function of management)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(planning, be important function in endeavor)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(planning, is management function)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(planning, be as function of managers)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of management)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(planning, is management function)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(planning, be as function of management)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(planning, be as function of managers)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(planning, is management function)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(planning, be important function in endeavor)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(planning, be as function of managers)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(planning, be as pervasive function)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(planning, be important function in endeavor)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(planning, be as pervasive function)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(planning, be as pervasive function)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(planning, be as primary function of management)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(planning, is primary management function)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(planning, is primary management function)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(planning, be as function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(planning, is primary management function)

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.69 , stage Weight: 0.64 , step Weight: 0.62 , preparation Weight: 0.62
Siblings	marketing Weight: 0.34 , plan Weight: 0.34 , social engineering Weight: 0.33 , development Weight: 0.32 , approach Weight: 0.32

planning: be as function

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings