plastic wrap: be insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.76
, material
Weight: 0.68
, packaging
Weight: 0.67
, container
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.35
, paper towel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be insulator 1.00
is insulator 1.00
be good insulator 0.98
is good insulator 0.98
is bad insulator 0.97
is heat insulator 0.95
is good heat insulator 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, be good insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be good insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be good insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be good insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(plastic wrap, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)