polar bear: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, arctic
Weight: 0.72
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
be in danger 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(polar bear, be under threat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(polar bear, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(arctic, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bear, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(panda bear, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(polar bear, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(polar bear, be in danger)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be in danger)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be in danger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(polar bear, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(polar bear, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic, be in danger)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in danger)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic, be in danger)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(polar bear, be under threat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bear, be in danger)