pollution: be linked to wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be linked to wildlife 1.00
affect wildlife 0.93
affect giraffes habitat 0.80
affect habitat 0.80
affect animals 0.79
affect habitats 0.79
affect animal life 0.78
affect biodiversity 0.77
affect humans animals 0.77
affect forest ecosystem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(smog, affect animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(smog, affect animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(air pollution, affect animal life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pollution, be linked to wildlife)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pollution, affect habitat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pollution, affect wildlife)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pollution, affect habitat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pollution, affect animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pollution, affect wildlife)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pollution, affect animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pollution, affect animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pollution, affect wildlife)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect wildlife)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pollution, affect habitat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect animals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pollution, affect habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pollution, be linked to wildlife)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(smog, affect animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animal life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be linked to wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)