portfolio: management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collection
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.56
, solution
Weight: 0.56
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, operating system
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, management
Weight: 0.31
, service station
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
management 1.00
be important to management 0.95
be important to business management 0.91
be important to financial management 0.88
differ from line management 0.79
be important to managers 0.77
be called resource manager 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called resource manager)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to managers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(management, be important to business management)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(management, differ from line management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(management, be important to business management)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(management, be important to business management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(management, differ from line management)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, differ from line management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(leverage, be important to financial management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(leverage, be important to managers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to managers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operating system, be called resource manager)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called resource manager)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(portfolio, management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(portfolio, management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, differ from line management)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(management, be important to business management)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to managers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(operating system, be called resource manager)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to financial management)