possum: has state pest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents marsupial
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, animal
Weight: 0.52
Siblings sugar glider
Weight: 0.56
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, wallaby
Weight: 0.37
, kangaroo
Weight: 0.37
, opossum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pest 1.00
be considered pest 0.96
has state pests 0.91
be pest in zealand 0.88
be pest in new zealand 0.88
be regarded pests 0.85
have in zealand pests 0.81
have in new zealand pests 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, has state pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, have in zealand pests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wallaby, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wallaby, has state pests)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wallaby, have in zealand pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(wallaby, have in new zealand pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(possum, has state pest)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(possum, be considered pest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(possum, be considered pest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(possum, be considered pest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(possum, be considered pest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(possum, be regarded pests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(possum, be regarded pests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(possum, be regarded pests)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(possum, be regarded pests)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(possum, has state pest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wallaby, has state pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(possum, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest)